Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Elevate Capital Network
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-13 05:58:50
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (863)
Related
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- American Whitelash: Fear-mongering and the rise in white nationalist violence
- Unchecked Global Warming Could Collapse Whole Ecosystems, Maybe Within 10 Years
- How to start swimming as an adult
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- 3 dead, 5 wounded in Kansas City, Missouri, shooting
- “We Found Love” With These 50% Off Deals From Fenty Beauty by Rihanna: Don’t Miss the Last Day to Shop
- This Amazon Maxi Dress Has 2,300+ Five-Star Ratings— & Reviewers Say It Fits Beautifully
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Transcript: Cindy McCain on Face the Nation, June 25, 2023
Ranking
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Teresa Giudice Accuses Melissa Gorga of Sending Her to Prison in RHONJ Reunion Shocker
- This Amazon Maxi Dress Has 2,300+ Five-Star Ratings— & Reviewers Say It Fits Beautifully
- This Amazon Maxi Dress Has 2,300+ Five-Star Ratings— & Reviewers Say It Fits Beautifully
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Climate Protesters Kicked, Dragged in Indonesia
- Transcript: Rep. Veronica Escobar on Face the Nation, June 25, 2023
- Climate Action, Clean Energy Key to U.S. Prosperity, Business Leaders Urge Trump
Recommendation
What to watch: O Jolie night
Video: Dreamer who Conceived of the Largest Arctic Science Expedition in History Now Racing to Save it
Tom Brokaw's Never Give Up: A prairie family history, and a personal credo
Elizabeth Holmes Begins 11-Year Prison Sentence in Theranos Fraud Case
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Yes, Kieran Culkin Really Wore a $7 Kids' Shirt in the Succession Finale
American Climate Video: A Maintenance Manager Made Sure Everyone Got Out of Apple Tree Village Alive
Vaccines could be the next big thing in cancer treatment, scientists say