Current:Home > MyWoman files lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting customers' biometric data -Elevate Capital Network
Woman files lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting customers' biometric data
View
Date:2025-04-11 20:09:36
An Illinois woman has filed a lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting and storing her and other customers' biometric data through facial recognition technology and other means without their consent.
The lawsuit, filed March 11 in a Cook County circuit court and published by local outlet Fox 32, alleges Target's surveillance systems covertly collect things like face and fingerprint scans from customers as part of its anti-theft efforts. The alleged practice violates Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, the lawsuit contends, a law the state legislature passed in 2008 to protect people from details of their physical characteristics being collected without their knowledge.
"Target does not notify customers of this fact prior to store entry, nor does it obtain consent prior to collecting its customers’ Biometric Data," according to the lawsuit.
Target did not immediately respond Tuesday morning to USA TODAY's request for comment.
What is biometric data and how does BIPA protect Illinois residents' privacy?
Biometric information comprises data on a range of a person's physical characteristics, including retina or iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, hand scans, facial geometry and DNA.
Illinois' biometric privacy act, better known as BIPA, makes it unlawful for private companies to use facial recognition technology to identify and track such information without people's consent, according to the state's American Civil Liberties Union.
The law also requires companies to specify how the information would be retained and when it would be destroyed.
In 2022, the social media app Snapchat was sued over an alleged violation of BIPA pertaining to the data collected from users who used features likes lenses and filters to take photos and videos of themselves. The company ultimately agreed to a $35 million settlement, according to the Rockford Register Star, a USA TODAY Network publication.
In the newer suit against Target, attorneys argued that the retail giant's stores across the country are outfitted with cameras and video surveillance, many of which have the capability of collecting biometric data. For at least a decade, Target has also made use of an "advanced system of electronic surveillance" at bases spread throughout the U.S., as well as two forensic labs, to "enhance video footage and analyze finger prints."
While the system is meant to detect shoplifters, the lawsuit contended that it captures any customer's face who enters the store.
"There are numerous instances of former Target employees detailing its facial recognition system circulating on the internet as well," the lawsuit said, referencing a TikTok page where customers and ex-employees discuss concerns about the system.
Amazon, Google, others also sued for biometric privacy concerns
Target is far from the first major American company to face legal action due to concerns over its biometric data collection practices
Last year, Amazon was hit with a class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to properly inform New York City customers of biometric information collection in Amazon Go stores. Amazon confirmed to USA TODAY that is used biometric data for its Amazon One "palm-based identity" payment system but denied using facial recognition technology in any of its stores.
In 2022, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Google, claiming the tech giant captured and used the state's residents' biometric data without their permission through products and services like Google Photos, Google Assistant and Nest Hub Max.
Contributing: Wyatte Grantham-Philips; Brett Molina;
Eric Lagatta covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
veryGood! (146)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- The Paris Climate Problem: A Dangerous Lack of Urgency
- A Guide to Father of 7 Robert De Niro's Sprawling Family Tree
- Judge’s Ruling to Halt Fracking Regs Could Pose a Broader Threat to Federal Oversight
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Kim Zolciak Spotted Without Wedding Ring Amid Kroy Biermann Divorce
- EPA Won’t Investigate Scientist Accused of Underestimating Methane Leaks
- Why are Canadian wildfires affecting the U.S.?
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Oil Industry Satellite for Measuring Climate Pollution Set to Launch
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Protesters Call for a Halt to Three Massachusetts Pipeline Projects
- Thanks to the 'tripledemic,' it can be hard to find kids' fever-reducing medicines
- Factory workers across the U.S. say they were exposed to asbestos on the job
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- The Mugler H&M Collection Is Here at Last— & It's a Fashion Revolution
- Thousands of toddler sippy cups and bottles are recalled over lead poisoning risk
- Ozempic side effects could lead to hospitalization — and doctors warn that long-term impacts remain unknown
Recommendation
Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
Chile Cancels Plan to Host UN Climate Summit Amid Civil Unrest at Home
Judge’s Ruling to Halt Fracking Regs Could Pose a Broader Threat to Federal Oversight
How Medicare Advantage plans dodged auditors and overcharged taxpayers by millions
Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
Rhode Island Sues Oil Companies Over Climate Change, First State in Wave of Lawsuits
InsideClimate News to Host 2019 Investigative Journalism Fellow
In U.S. Methane Hot Spot, Researchers Pinpoint Sources of 250 Leaks