Current:Home > NewsThom Browne's win against Adidas is also one for independent designers, he says -Elevate Capital Network
Thom Browne's win against Adidas is also one for independent designers, he says
View
Date:2025-04-12 14:07:00
A strange scene unfolded in a Manhattan courtroom in early January. Jury members examined pieces of luxury clothing by American designer Thom Browne worth more than $1,000 a pop that had been wheeled out on a rack for their consideration.
At the center of attention were four stripes featured on the left sleeves of jackets and tops and on the left legs of fancy sweatpants. Were these marks an infringement of the three stripes featured on the products of sportswear giant Adidas? That was the question.
Adidas had previously fought similar battles against brands including Marc Jacobs, Skechers and Tesla. The outcome of the case with Thom Browne, which is a subsidiary of the fashion house Ermenegildo Zegna, could expand smaller companies' power to enforce trademarks.
On Jan. 12, Browne scored a major victory, one in which he saw himself as the independent David battling a German multinational Goliath. The eight-person jury found that Thom Browne was not guilty of infringing upon the three stripes Adidas uses in its logo. He can keep using four bars in his designs.
Browne said the trademark battle was not for him alone.
"It was so clear to me to fight for myself, but also to fight for other independent designers and younger designers when they create something unique — that they have the protection of knowing that there won't be some big company that will come and try to take it away from them," he told NPR's A Martínez.
Adidas had reached out to Browne in 2006 when his company was still a fledgling one. At the time, he was using three horizontal bars rather than the four that have now become synonymous with his brand. Adidas asked him to stop; he agreed the next year to add a fourth stripe.
It wasn't the end of the story. Adidas came calling back 15 years later, after Thom Browne had expanded into activewear and began dressing the Cleveland Cavaliers and FC Barcelona in suits prior to their games.
"There was a reason for me to make my point and to not give up something that became so important, emotionally even, to my collection," Browne said. "There wasn't any confusion between my bars and their three vertical stripes."
Adidas filed its lawsuit in 2021 focusing on the use of four stripes, as well as Thom Browne's red, white and blue-stripe grosgrain ribbon loop inspired by locker tabs at the backs of tops and shoes, a nod to his childhood in a family of seven kids who all played sports.
Adidas, which had sought $8 million in damages, said in a statement that it was "disappointed with the verdict." The company vowed to "continue to vigilantly enforce our intellectual property, including filing any appropriate appeals."
Browne described the experience of the trial as "most interesting and stressful" for him. "I never want to live through it again, but it was important to live through it because I knew we needed to fight and make our case for what was right," he added.
To make his point, Browne showed up to court wearing one of his signature shorts suits, with a shrunken jacket and tie, knit cardigan, leather brogues and sport socks stopping just below the knee.
"It's not something I do just for a living," he explained. "People outside the courtroom needed to see me representing myself exactly the way that I am in the most real way. ... And so walking into the courtroom, I was just being myself."
A Martínez conducted the interview for the audio version of this story, produced by David West and edited by Olivia Hampton and Jojo Macaluso.
veryGood! (11526)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Here are the best U.S. cities for young Americans to start their career
- Climate Change Could Bring Water Bankruptcy With Grave Consequences
- Launched to great fanfare a few years ago, Lordstown Motors is already bankrupt
- 'Most Whopper
- That ’70s Show Alum Danny Masterson Found Guilty of Rape
- U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Block Exxon Climate Fraud Investigation
- Zooey Deschanel Is Officially a New Girl With Blonde Hair Transformation
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Beginning of the End for Canada’s Tar Sands or Just a Blip?
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Renewable Energy Groups Push Back Against Rick Perry’s Controversial Grid Study
- Supreme Court takes up dispute over educational benefits for veterans
- Coal Ash Is Contaminating Groundwater in at least 22 States, Utility Reports Show
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- A Coal Ash Spill Made These Workers Sick. Now, They’re Fighting for Compensation.
- Trump Budget Risks ‘Serious Harm’ to America’s Energy Future, 7 Former DOE Officials Warn
- American Climate Video: An Ode to Paradise Lost in California’s Most Destructive Wildfire
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Trump heard in audio clip describing highly confidential, secret documents
Justin Timberlake Is Thirsting Over Jessica Biel’s Iconic Summer Catch Scene Too
Supreme Court rejects independent state legislature theory in major election law case
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Kim Kardashian Teases Potential New Romance With Fred in Kardashians Teaser
Court dismisses Ivanka Trump from New York attorney general's fraud lawsuit
Titan sub passengers signed waivers covering death. Could their families still sue OceanGate?